Geriatric oncology in Spain: survey results and analysis of the current situation.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric oncology (GO) is a discipline that focuses on the management of elderly patients with cancer. The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) created a Working group dedicated to geriatric oncology in February 2016. OBJECTIVES: The main goal of this study was to describe the current situation in Spain regarding the management of elderly cancer patients through an online survey of medical oncologists. METHODS: A descriptive survey was sent to several hospitals by means of the SEOM website. A personal e-mail was also sent to SEOM members. RESULTS: Between March 2016 and April 2017, 154 answers were collected. Only 74 centers (48%) had a geriatrics department and a mere 21 (14%) medical oncology departments had a person dedicated to GO. The vast majority (n = 135; 88%) had the perception that the number of elderly patients with cancer seen in clinical practice had increased. Eighteen (12%) oncologists had specific protocols and geriatric scales were used at 55 (31%) centers. Almost all (92%) claimed to apply special management practices using specific tools. There was agreement that GO afforded certain potential advantages. Finally, 99% of the oncologists surveyed believed it and that training in GO had to be improved. CONCLUSIONS: From the nationwide survey promoted by the Spanish Geriatric Oncology Working Group on behalf of SEOM, we conclude that there is currently no defined care structure for elderly cancer patients. There is an increasing perception of the need for training in GO. This survey reflects a reality in which specific needs are perceived.

Management of lung cancer-associated anaemia: the Spanish Lung Cancer Anaemia Survey (SLCAS)

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the Spanish Lung Cancer Anaemia Survey (SLCAS) was to thoroughly investigate lung cancer-associated anaemia management, and describe the profile of lung cancer patients in relation to anaemia incidence and tumour type in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This survey collected data from 1089 randomly recruited patients gathered by 50 Spanish physicians at 38 sites. In addition, a qualitative assay was performed through 16 one-to-one and 2 one-to-two interviews, and a discussion group of 4 cancer specialists participating in the survey. RESULTS: Lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment had haemoglobin (Hb) levels <12.0 g/dl in 58.0% of the cases, in contrast to 39.0% of patients receiving no chemotherapy. Anaemia was treated in 53.0% of patients with Hb<12 g/dl (45.0% epoetin, 3.9% transfusion, 4.1% iron). Mean Hb level trigger was 9.7 g/dl for administration of epoetin and 8.2 g/dl for blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: SLCAS reveals a significant change in the management of anaemia and clinical practice pattern in the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (45.0% vs. 18.0%) and much less use of blood transfusions (3.9% vs. 15.0%) since the European Cancer Anaemia Survey performed five years ago (AU)

A phase II randomized trial of gemcitabine-docetaxel versus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To test efficacy and tolerability of non-platinum regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Chemonaive patients with measurable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), or gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD), maximumsix cycles in a phase IIB trial. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were randomized. Response rates (GC vs. GD, respectively): complete 3.6/2.0%, Partial 30.9/38.0%. Median Overall Survival (OS): 8.9 months in both groups (P = 0.53); and median time to progression (TTP): 6.2/5.5 months respectively (P = 0.61). Toxicities included (GC vs. GD, respectively): grade 3-4 neutropenia 49.1/41.2%; grade 3 thrombocytopenia 30.9/3.9%; grade 3 anemia 14.5/3.9%. Non-haematological toxicity was similar, except for nausea and vomiting, (16.3/2%); renal toxicity (3.7/0%) and hepatic toxicity (5.6/12.7%). CONCLUSIONS: With a higher overall response rate and lower toxicity, GD is a good first treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy followed by radical therapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre study of galician-lung-cancer-group.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of a gemcitabine-cisplatin-vinorelbine combination in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=46) with stage III NSCLC and naive of therapy were recruited into the trial to receive gemcitabine (G, 1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, cisplatin (C, 100 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and vinorelbine (V, 25 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three cycles. RESULTS: Two patients achieved complete response (CR) and 23 partial response (PR), overall response 52%. Subsequent radical surgery included nine patients of whom four were non-resectable and five were resected and with 1 CR. Radiotherapy was administered to 31 patients, and two achieved CR. The median time to progression and overall survival were 37 and 50 weeks, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 35% of cycles, with two toxic deaths. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: This GCV combination is effective in patients with stage III NSCLC, and with an acceptable toxicity.

Phase II study of irinotecan as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this multicenter, open-labeled, Phase II study performed in Spain was to assess the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) as first-line chemotherapy for patients suffering from advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). METHODS: Patients with histologically proven CRC and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, ages 18-70 years, with a performance status < or = 2, normal analytical values, and no prior chemotherapy or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed before study entry were selected. The treatment schedule was CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) intravenously administered once every 3 weeks. Both tumor response and toxicity were assessed using the World Health Organization and National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. Changes in performance status, weight, and symptoms also were measured. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (44 chemotherapy-naïve patients and 21 patients who completed prior adjuvant treatment) were enrolled. Of these, 24.7% of patients responded to the treatment, and 41.5% of patients had stable disease. Patients who had not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy had a lower rate of progression on therapy (27.3%) compared with those who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (42.9%). The median survival was 19.9 months (range, 0.3-29.3 months). No significant differences were found in the median survival between chemotherapy-naïve patients and patients who had received previous chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, which were observed in 23.1% and 30.8% of patients and in 5.9% and 10.9% of the cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current antitumor efficacy results show that 350 mg/m(2) of CPT-11 administered every 3 weeks is an active and feasible first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with CRC. Finally, the overall safety data confirmed that CPT-11 is a well tolerated treatment.

[Isolated primary hyperaldosteronism caused by adrenocortical carcinoma]. / Hiperaldosteronismo primario aislado causado por carcinoma córtico-suprarrenal.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of adrenocortical carcinoma and primary aldosteronism as the sole endocrine manifestation. METHODS/RESULTS: A 39-year-old male with adrenocortical carcinoma and primary aldosteronism is presented. Following complete hormonal and radiological evaluation, right adrenalectomy and nephrectomy were performed (pT2pN0M0, stage II). Blood pressure, serum potassium and aldosterone levels returned to normal. The patient received adjuvant therapy with carboplatin and etoposide. After 15 months' disease-free interval, lung metastasis was diagnosed, without evidence of local recurrence until 5 months later, when hypertension and primary hyperaldosteronism reappeared. There were no other endocrine disorders. Treatment with spironolactone, 5-FU and adriamycin was instituted with no tumor response and the patient died 3 years later from complications of endobronchial metastasis. CONCLUSION: Adrenocortical carcinoma with isolated primary hyperaldosteronism is uncommon and consequently there is no wide experience in regard to its diagnosis and treatment. Although randomized studies are not available, adjuvant therapy using other agents instead of mitotane (o,p-DDD), such as the combination of cisplatin and etoposide (VP-16), seems reasonable in the locally advanced stages. Mitotane may be useful when hypercortisolism is present, but its efficacy as an antitumor agent has been controversial.

Age: a critical factor in cancer management. A prospective comparative study of 400 patients.

BACKGROUND: older people are often excluded from cancer treatments solely on the grounds of age. AIMS: to compare cancer treatment in older and younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: between June 1992 and September 1994, 400 cancer patients were included in this prospective comparative study. The factors compared between younger and older subjects were performance status, associated chronic diseases, delay in diagnosis, stage of disease and initial treatment. RESULTS: 54 patients (25.5%) under 70 years of age were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, in comparison with 25 (12.5%) of the 200 older patients (P < 0.001). Associated chronic pathologies were more frequent in the older patients (55% vs 18.5%, P < 0.001). There were no statistical differences between both groups in diagnostic delay. Localized disease was found in 127 (63%) of the younger patients and in 109 (54%) of the older patients, the difference not being significant. The percentage of patients who underwent oncological treatment was higher in the younger than the older group (87.5% vs 56%, P < 0.001). The main cause of therapeutic exclusion in both groups was poor performance status; however, in the older group other variables--such as the presence of chronic disease and patients' or relatives' wishes and doctors' opinions--influenced the decision not to give specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: this study confirms that the clinical characteristics and treatment of aged people with cancer are different from those of younger patients. Nevertheless, there is considerable doubt about whether an arbitrary age limit should continue to be accepted as a discriminatory factor in some diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in cancer patients.

Follow-up study in head and neck cancer: cure rate according to tumor location and stage.

The purpose of this clinical study was to analyze a long-term follow-up of all the patients with head and neck cancer in our institution. Between 1973 and 1993, 1,355 consecutive cases of head and neck cancerwere diagnosed, treated and followed up regularly. All were subjected to a multidisciplinary approach, and followed up until death or for 10 years with no event of disease. The local relapse rate was 20% and the node-regional relapse rate 15%. Distant metastases were observed in 6% of the patients mainly arising from the nasopharynx (23%) followed by the hypopharynx (11%). The main organ involved was the lung (50%). Median follow-up of the group was 10 years (range 4 months to 15 years). Cancer cure was observed after 5 years in glottic and supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma, oral and nasopharyngeal cancer and after 2.5 years in patients with cancer of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The highest cure rate was 80% in the glottis, followed by 70% in the supraglottic area, 45% in the mouth, 30% in the nasopharynx, 25% in the oropharynx, and 20% in the hypopharynx. A second primary tumor was observed in 7% of the patients and a third primary in 0.6% of the patients. Only in 7 patients, the second or third primary was seen after 5 years of follow-up. Curability should be observed after 5 years from definitive therapy of glottic, supraglottic, oral and nasopharyngeal and earlier in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Further follow-up should be discontinued. Second and third neoplasias are the main problems after 5 years of follow-up but their incidence is low.

Calcium supplementation and ototoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin.

We have studied the effect on ototoxicity of maintaining serum calcium concentration by calcium gluconate infusion in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin in a randomized study in two groups: 11 patients received calcium gluconate, 4 mg kg-1 i.v. infusion during cisplatin therapy; 11 other patients without any calcium supplementation served as controls. All of them received the first course of chemotherapy, based on cisplatin, 120 mg m2 with a hydration schedule. An audiogram was performed in each patient just before cisplatin and repeated after 1 day and 3 weeks. Mean total calcium concentration in control patients before and after chemotherapy was 2.2 +/- 0.14 (95% confidence interval 1.9-2.5) and 2.0 +/- 0.13 (95% CI 1.7-2.24) mmol 1(-1) respectively (P = 0.0004) and for ionized calcium 1.22 +/- 0.52 (95% CI 0.21-2.23) and 1.11 +/- 0.07 (95% CI 0.97-1.25) mmol 1(-1) respectively (P = 0.0005). Serum magnesium levels were maintained or increased by magnesium supplementation. Although there was no change in serum total or ionized calcium, or serum magnesium in the calcium infusion group, no differences in hearing loss between the groups were observed. High-dose cisplatin chemotherapy for cancer patients induces an acute decrease of serum total calcium and serum ionized calcium and audiometric changes. Maintenance of calcium serum levels by calcium gluconate infusion did not protect against ototoxicity in those patients.

Survival after chemotherapy with cisplatin and infusion of bleomycin prior to local-regional treatment in pyriform sinus cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare different approaches including neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Ninety-six consecutive patients with pyriform sinus squamous cell carcinoma with no distant metastases were entered. The first 48 patients were treated with surgery plus postoperative radiation therapy (50-60 Gy) over cervical lymphatics. The next 48 patients were treated by induction chemotherapy with two courses of cisplatin, 120 mg/m2 i.v. day one, plus bleomycin, 20 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days in 24-hr i.v. perfusion followed by definitive surgery and postoperative radiation therapy as in the first therapeutic group. RESULTS: Definitive surgery was performed in 38 control vs 39 neoadjuvant patients. Complete response was observed in 9 (18.7%) and partial response in 32 (66.7%) of 48 chemotherapy-treated patients. Partial plus complete response was seen in 41 (85.4%) of the 48 patients. Comparison between controls versus chemotherapy-treated groups showed persistence of the disease in 10 vs 9 patients; local-regional relapses in 21 versus 14 patients; and distant metastases in 4 vs 2 patients. Median survival was 12 vs 40 months. Survival curves were statistically better in neoadjuvants than in controls (P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary therapy slightly decreases the rate of local-regional relapses and distant metastases and should improve survival in this set of pyriform sinus cancer patients.